For me, the legislation is infuriating on two levels. First, it's indisputable that the history taught in most grade school classes is the history of white people. As a product of California's public schools, and later a substitute teacher in them, I know first hand that children are taught that missions are good things that "civilized the Indians;" and that although Mexican-Americans, Asian-Americans, and African-Americans made enumerable contributions to the development of this country, I don't think I could have named a single one prior to attending college. The pictures I saw of civil war soldiers, prized leaders, and scientific innovators were always that of white men. Though the Arizona law prohibits the teaching of curriculum that is "designed primarily for pupils of a particular ethnic group," it's clear that the education that most children get is designed for and biased towards white people. The law, therefore, isn't banning "ethnic" studies it's banning "non-white studies."
The second reason I'm infuriated is that the law prohibits classes that, "advocate ethnic solidarity instead of the treatment of pupils as individuals." Don't get me started on this country's obsession with perceived "individualism." There is no soap box tall enough. But this prohibition exemplifies the dominant culture's inability to step back and think about the realities of under represented groups. Being someone who is constantly the "only [insert identity] person in the room/school/office" is draining. When you don't show up in the history books, science books, or school newspaper you can feel down right invisible.
Since starting law school I've been very active in the Latino Law Student Association (LLSA) at my institution. Next year I'll serve as President of the organization. There have definitely been moments where LLSA was the only place in the law building where I felt validate, appreciated, and "normal." The ability to feel "normal," or at least passable, is a privilege that many white students (and legislatures) take for granted. Yes, Arizona, I am and will always be an individual but I also need my education to appreciate the value of community and affinity groups for underrepresented students.
And lets be honest, this bill is nothing more than hate and fear mongering. The Arizona House of Representatives wasn't worried about students not being treated as individuals...they are worried about people of color realizing their own strength. I'm not saying all us brown people would like to get together and over throw the government. I'm saying that right now students of color perform worse (particularly in law school) than our white their counterparts for absolutely no good reason. Maybe if we got together and realized the strength, compassion, and potential we possess when we work together we would organize and realize our full potential. Maybe we'd demand better social services, education, and funding in low income areas. Maybe we'd steal back the proverbial bootstraps folks are always talk about. Maybe we'd take over some of the legislative seats.
Also, check out this great article from The Nation.
If you can be in Arizona on the 29th, you should participate in this for me.

Great job!
ReplyDeleteI hope that every American, regardless of where he lives, will stop and examine his conscience about this and other related incidents. This Nation was founded by men of many nations and backgrounds. It was founded on the principle that all men are created equal, and that the rights of every man are diminished when the rights of one man are threatened. All of us ought to have the right to be treated as he would wish to be treated, as one would wish his children to be treated, but this is not the case.
ReplyDeleteI know the proponents of this law say that the majority approves of this law, but the majority is not always right. Would women or non-whites have the vote if we listen to the majority of the day, would the non-whites have equal rights (and equal access to churches, housing, restaurants, hotels, retail stores, schools, colleges and yes water fountains) if we listen to the majority of the day? We all know the answer, a resounding, NO!
Today we are committed to a worldwide struggle to promote and protect the rights of all who wish to be free. In a time of domestic crisis men of good will and generosity should be able to unite regardless of party or politics and do what is right, not what is just popular with the majority. Some men comprehend discrimination by never have experiencing it in their lives, but the majority will only understand after it happens to them.
nice blog.. have a view of my blog when free.. http://www.lonelyreload.blogspot.com .. do leave me some comment / guide if can.. if interested can follow my blog...
ReplyDeleteI dig the idea of random stops. That's how they catch the majority of drunk drivers, so it's clearly effective. There still needs to be some sort of national ID card that people can easily carry around without using a money belt (stupid passports being all big - and also ugly since the redesign, but that's a whole other issue). Anyway, AZ is courting trouble, and last I saw, 11 other states are introducing similar legislation. Ugh.
ReplyDelete